Using artificial intelligence (AI) to analyze satellite photographs, the New York Times conducted a landmark study that contradicted guarantees of safety for Gazan residents by uncovering the use of huge 2,000-pound bombs by Israeli armed forces in southern Gaza.

Using artificial intelligence (AI) techniques, the Times Visual Investigations team examined satellite imagery of south Gaza and trained the system to recognize possible bomb craters. After the AI identified 1,600 potential bomb craters, Times reporters carefully examined them to rule out false positives, including water towers or craters from earlier battles.

Evidence from the probe showed that Israel had used 2,000-pound bombs at least 200 times in the area it had proclaimed safe for people. These bombs are precise, but their “extreme” area of effect makes densely populated places like Gaza vulnerable.

Risks and Collateral Effects

Israeli forces frequently utilize 2,000-pound bombs, which can be problematic in areas with a high population density because of their extensive collateral damage. Former UN war crimes investigator Marc Garlasco underlined the need for caution in their deployment, raising worries about possible harm to civilians in such places.

The evidence found by AI calls into question the reliability of safety guarantees and the effects of military operations on civilian populations. The world community might carefully review these results and demand responsibility as well as inquiries into possible transgressions of international law.

Technological Openness

Investigative journalism’s usage of AI demonstrates how technology is becoming more and more important in identifying and deciphering complicated circumstances. This method makes it possible to comprehend what’s happening on the ground more thoroughly and highlights important issues that could otherwise be overlooked.

The New York Times’ research has brought artificial intelligence (AI) to the attention of journalists. The findings highlight the significance of accountability, transparency, and ethical considerations in military operations, especially when human safety is involved.