At a recent event for crypto enthusiasts, former President Donald Trump proposed a bold—and absurd—solution to pay off the U.S. debt. In true Trump fashion, he suggested clearing the nation’s $35 trillion debt with cryptocurrencies and a few supplies from Staples. The crowd’s response? Laughter.

The $35 Trillion ‘Crypto Check’

Trump, who has flip-flopped on cryptocurrencies over the years, appeared confident in his latest plan. “Maybe we’ll pay off the $35 trillion in crypto,” he said. “How do you like that? I’ll write on a little piece of paper, ‘$35 trillion crypto’ — we have no debt. Right?”

His attempt at humor landed—kind of. The crowd erupted in laughter, though it was clear that many weren’t taking his idea seriously.

Rewarding the Crypto Crowd?

While the suggestion seemed like a joke, Trump has been trying to appeal to crypto enthusiasts. He recently made a similar statement during an interview, saying, “a little crypto check” could “wipe out” the national debt. It’s hard to see this as anything more than a move to win over crypto supporters.

Does Trump Understand Cryptocurrency?

The core issue isn’t just the absurdity of paying off trillions in debt with crypto—it’s Trump’s fundamental misunderstanding of how cryptocurrencies work. Unlike traditional currencies, cryptos operate in decentralized systems and aren’t backed by governments. Simply writing a “crypto check” doesn’t erase debt, and the suggestion reflects a lack of basic understanding.

A History of Ignorance

This latest blunder adds to a long list of topics where Trump has shown little knowledge. From climate change to economics, Trump’s ideas often raise more eyebrows than they solve problems. His latest foray into crypto seems like yet another attempt to promise big solutions without grasping the details.

The Bigger Picture

While Trump continues to pander to different voter bases, his lack of understanding of complex issues like cryptocurrencies is becoming clearer. As the 2024 election draws closer, it’s worth asking: Does Trump have the knowledge to tackle real-world problems, or is he just offering soundbites to secure votes?

As laughter fades, voters might start demanding more than fl